Black Patches In Stool

incomplete and infringement of Article 35

APPEAL 5564/2002 SPECIAL RESOLUTION SECRETARY 61,372

Santiago, 27 May, two thousand four.

Viewed: Plays the sentence on appeal, with the exception of the fourth reason is eliminated. And having in place and also this: 1) That although the expression is Christmas in the promise of the complaint is possible to understand the period from the time of the broadcast promotion until Christmas Day, and therefore the time factor is considered certain does not occur same with the other terms of the promotion, it is not possible to know how this can be implemented. In fact does not explain or say where this information can be of the form to request a refund offered. Thus it is not known if this requires buying in another setting and with the ballot to show that this cheaper, or just enough to bring information to other, lower price than that offered. 2) that the formulation releases the reported at page 13, is referred to the cause as appropriate to the time duration of the offer, but otherwise is referred to a promotion to that analyzed in different cars. 3 º) that in this way has been shown that the alleged breach of Article 35 of Law N º 19,496 and penalties of the procedure mentioned in Article 24 of the same. For these reasons, it reverses the decision of 26 August two thousand and two, written in page 23, in rejecting the complaint on pages 1, and states that Distribucion y Servicio D & S SA is ordered to pay a fine of five units monthly tax, and costs of the case. Sign up and be refunded. Drafting of the Minister, Jorge Dahm. No. 5564-2002. made by the Fourth Chamber of the Iltma . Court of Appeals.